01-18-2012, 05:07 PM
0
From a purely clinical standpoint they have a valid point.
However......the notion that someone would recklessly step in front of a train moving at speed while holding an umbrella which restricts vision with the thought of the possibility of getting struck which might send rended body parts flying that could strike a bystander is most definitely NOT a reasonable assumption!
As well, the premise that this is a reasonable ground for filing suit against the DECEASED man's estate is at best simply appeasing the plaintiff's ability to file and at worst a fucking insane idea!
However......the notion that someone would recklessly step in front of a train moving at speed while holding an umbrella which restricts vision with the thought of the possibility of getting struck which might send rended body parts flying that could strike a bystander is most definitely NOT a reasonable assumption!
As well, the premise that this is a reasonable ground for filing suit against the DECEASED man's estate is at best simply appeasing the plaintiff's ability to file and at worst a fucking insane idea!
![[Image: alcatraz-prison-picture2-1.jpg]](http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b78/lktraz/Sigs%20and%20Avs/alcatraz-prison-picture2-1.jpg)
![[Image: dont_care_offended.gif]](http://s17.photobucket.com/user/lktraz/media/Sigs%20and%20Avs/2012%20Bumper%20stickers/dont_care_offended.gif.html)