11-02-2011, 10:08 AM
0
(11-01-2011, 05:30 PM)Jamminitin Wrote: Ridiculous Havoc that you would compare a neccesary medical treatment (chemo) to a cosmetic surgery. There is nothing about the foreskin that requires removal. Nothing.
There is also nothing that requires it's presence, the comparison is that when an infant or child needs medical treatment the parents make that decision, based on whatever they want to base it on, religion,or cartoons, it doesn't matter, if it's not in your living room it's none of your business.
In this thread I have read that the decision should be left up to the infant to decide, how fucking ill informed is that?
Of course abortion isn't the same thing, it can't be right? that would mean that someone else would be making the decision for the incubator.
I love the mutilation analogy though it was a nice touch, should we talk about lipo? or breast implants, or ass lifts and face lifts in the same way?
The simple fact is it's none of your business, no education is required to have kids, so obviously none is required to make decisions about circumcision.
A resolution to avoid an evil is seldom framed till the evil is so far advanced as to make avoidance impossible.
— Thomas Hardy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
— Thomas Hardy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------