0
Oy!!!!!!
The 4.0 has LESS HP than the 3.7
3.7 = 305 HP
4.0 = 210 HP
Still a healthy rating but 95 less is a significant difference.
It's healthy in a 3,400 lb vehicle but not as nice as the 305 rating on the smaller but gutsier engine.
My 88 Beretta was a bit modified and produced 228 HP from a 2.8 injected 6 cyl. At just over 2,600 lbs it sucked the headlights out of the 5.0 Mustangs of the time. There's no reason your new Mustang shouldn't have right respectable performance!
BTW......most bracket racers now prefer automatics over manuals (more consistency).
The 4.0 has LESS HP than the 3.7
3.7 = 305 HP
4.0 = 210 HP
Still a healthy rating but 95 less is a significant difference.
It's healthy in a 3,400 lb vehicle but not as nice as the 305 rating on the smaller but gutsier engine.
My 88 Beretta was a bit modified and produced 228 HP from a 2.8 injected 6 cyl. At just over 2,600 lbs it sucked the headlights out of the 5.0 Mustangs of the time. There's no reason your new Mustang shouldn't have right respectable performance!
BTW......most bracket racers now prefer automatics over manuals (more consistency).
![[Image: alcatraz-prison-picture2-1.jpg]](http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b78/lktraz/Sigs%20and%20Avs/alcatraz-prison-picture2-1.jpg)
![[Image: dont_care_offended.gif]](http://s17.photobucket.com/user/lktraz/media/Sigs%20and%20Avs/2012%20Bumper%20stickers/dont_care_offended.gif.html)