![]() |
WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - Printable Version +- Twitchin Kitten - conversation community (https://twitchinkitten.com) +-- Forum: The Club House (https://twitchinkitten.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Twitchy's Club House (https://twitchinkitten.com/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! (/thread-4703.html) Pages:
1
2
|
WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - Twitchin Kitten - 08-10-2016 Seriously? Apparently this site is offensive to someone on facebook. The douche reported the site's facebook page and I went to do some promoting and all the content is stripped. Let's get some energy going here again and get some members and activity away from there and more here. That little cocksucker is now blocking ad-blockers too. YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS WHEN ZUCKERBERG NEEDS TO MAKE MORE MONEY. Zuckerberg is a money grubbing douche From the article: "The social network relies on content from publishers to give users something to see when they visit the site." Something to see? My feed is already flooded with shit from things that have no interest to me that I don't want to see. I want to see my friends. NOT ADVERTS. RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - Stealth Geek - 10-22-2016 Maybe they reported it because there's racist slang in the url... RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - Twitchin Kitten - 10-22-2016 (10-22-2016, 04:16 AM)Stealth Geek Wrote: Maybe they reported it because there's racist slang in the url... There is no racist slang int the URL. RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - twisteroo - 10-23-2016 Sure there is. I see twit, witch, itch, chin, kit, ten, all of those are obviously racist. RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - Vizth Hal - 10-24-2016 I vaguely remember you telling me social justice warriors weren't a threat some 2-3 years ago lol. They will get offended over anything. Also why is the old Igasm thread recommended as a related post? RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - Twitchin Kitten - 10-24-2016 (10-23-2016, 08:54 AM)twisteroo Wrote: Sure there is. I need to see what a race of twits looks like. Throw in some of those ten's, chins and itches and you'll convince me. ![]() (10-24-2016, 02:42 AM)Vizth Hal Wrote: I vaguely remember you telling me social justice warriors weren't a threat some 2-3 years ago lol. I don't remember that Viz. The "related" post is because the word "offensive" is in it's title like this thread's. RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - LKTraz - 10-25-2016 *adopts an overly snotty and elitist tone of voice* Well.....it's clear that this "Twitter Kitchen" or what ever it's called site is racist because it doesn't feature pictures of gay pride parades, black lives matter or dear dear Hillary *swoon* on it's main page! [/brain death] Fucking idiots wouldn't recognize REAL conversation if it was blasted directly into their ears. There's no mindless "like" buttons or "look at me I'm doing such and such at such and such a location from X time till Y time" which enables burglars and stalkers and then they wonder "Why oh why did this happen to me?" THAT'S what's offensive about this forum. Fucking blind assed Zuckerberg fan-boy sheeple. (Hey....that was kind of rant-ish! Boy did that ever feel good!!!!! ![]() RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - Twitchin Kitten - 10-25-2016 I pressed a mindless like button for your rant! RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - LKTraz - 10-25-2016 (10-25-2016, 05:04 PM)Twitchin Kitten Wrote: I pressed a mindless like button for your rant! No so mindless really. You have to LOOK FOR IT here. ![]() RE: WE ARE TOO OFFENSIVE! - Stealth Geek - 10-26-2016 (10-22-2016, 08:15 PM)Twitchin Kitten Wrote:(10-22-2016, 04:16 AM)Stealth Geek Wrote: Maybe they reported it because there's racist slang in the url... http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=chink |