![]() |
Red Wings "No Goal" that video review was "Inconclusive" - Printable Version +- Twitchin Kitten - conversation community (https://twitchinkitten.com) +-- Forum: The Club House (https://twitchinkitten.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Twitchy's Club House (https://twitchinkitten.com/forum-7.html) +---- Forum: Sports (https://twitchinkitten.com/forum-10.html) +---- Thread: Red Wings "No Goal" that video review was "Inconclusive" (/thread-4468.html) |
Red Wings "No Goal" that video review was "Inconclusive" - ralgith - 11-11-2015 If this isn't bullshit I don't know what is... https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=7HvHNo2yHkg RE: Red Wings "No Goal" that video review was "Inconclusive" - Twitchin Kitten - 11-11-2015 OH wah wah wah. ![]() ![]() The Devils have been getting away with this bullshit since day one. So have: The Sabers Penguins RE: Red Wings "No Goal" that video review was "Inconclusive" - Biker Dude - 11-11-2015 I'm at work so I can't see it. But if it went against the redwings, it was spot on. RE: Red Wings "No Goal" that video review was "Inconclusive" - LKTraz - 11-11-2015 It sure looks like the puck was across the line. Why else would the goalie have reached so far back into the net before sweeping forward? Makes no difference to me who was who on that one. Just would like to see proper officiating across the board. RE: Red Wings "No Goal" that video review was "Inconclusive" - ralgith - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 05:20 PM)LKTraz Wrote: It sure looks like the puck was across the line. Exactly, and why would the situation room call for a review and then just say it's inconclusive. If you can find the Fox Sports Detroit announcers talking about it, they even diagram it all to show how it couldn't possibly be inconclusive. There's no black on the goalie's glove, so that black thing 6-8 inches behind the line is clearly the puck! |