A Nobel For........WHAT? - Printable Version +- Twitchin Kitten - conversation community (https://twitchinkitten.com) +-- Forum: The Club House (https://twitchinkitten.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Twitchy's Club House (https://twitchinkitten.com/forum-7.html) +---- Forum: Assholes In The News (https://twitchinkitten.com/forum-12.html) +---- Thread: A Nobel For........WHAT? (/thread-259.html) |
A Nobel For........WHAT? - LKTraz - 10-09-2009 It was announced today that President Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009. Now considering that the nominations close February 1st of each year, this means old "Barry" was only in office for 11 days. The committee said that it gave him the award based on his accomplishments and not his intentions. Really? And just WHICH accomplishments would they be? This simply goes to show that the Nobel Peace Prize has been degraded to being a meaningless accolade bestowed on only the most left wing individuals who happen to be making news at the time. Obama is the 4th US President and the 3rd sitting US Prez to get the award. Do you know who the other 3 were? Well....the one not seated upon winning was Jimmy Carter. Now who do you think the other two were? RE: A Nobel For........WHAT? - Twitchin Kitten - 10-12-2009 He won for "hopes and dreams" basically. The video I saw on his win had the committee saying he won on his 'extraordinary efforts to bring world peace through a nuclear free world." Bah. The prize has been cheapened to the extent it is rendered a joke. They used to select the recipient through this Nobel committee based on what he/she has actually accomplished to gain peace, not on HOPES of what will come. Now the committee for peace (only peace) is headed by a party of 5 politicians picked by the Kind of Norway. You don't elect someone on what you hope they might accomplish. 14 days in office is HARDLY any time to get ANY kind of peace effort started never-mind accomplished. He's got plenty more years that they could have let him be before they decided he needed to win this award. Well, what do you expect? Al Gore got it for his insane calculations on global warming - all which have been debunked by scientists. Kofi Annon was awarded it for his "peace" efforts at the UN when he headed it up. Yeah, can you say Oil for Food scandal? Rape enmasse by UN peace keeping troops in the Sudan and Somalia? And the list goes on there! Arafat! Oh My God he got a peace prize too. Here's a list of all past and present winners: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/index.html Through my search for this years' nominees, I couldn't find the comprehensive list (some links said the list of nominees for this year won't be out until 2059- I'll be long dead!) but I found this article: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/and-the-other-nobel-peace-prize-nominees-were-1801350.html In my opinion, the most deserving would have been: Quote: RE: A Nobel For........WHAT? - LKTraz - 10-12-2009 The sitting US Presidents were Woodrow Wilson who promised to keep the US out of WW 1 and them promptly got us in and authored the Treaty of Versailles which essentially caused WW 2. The other was Theodore Roosevelt who was terribly hawkish, was a "give em hell" military man and whose favorite statement was "Speak softly and carry a big stick". REALLY deserving of the PEACE PRIZE, weren't they? RE: A Nobel For........WHAT? - Twitchin Kitten - 10-12-2009 The "big stick" theory kept the Russians quiet when Reagan carried it. So quiet in fact they caved and gave up communism. But then we got wishy washy and they're slowly going back to their old ways. RE: A Nobel For........WHAT? - LKTraz - 10-12-2009 Hmmmmmm....funny that Regan never got the Nobel Peace Prize for peacefully dismantling the USSR's warmongering regime and ending the cold war. RE: A Nobel For........WHAT? - Twitchin Kitten - 10-12-2009 The far left is still too busy villain-izing him, that's why. |